<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>PhysXInfo.com - PhysX News &#187; Poll</title>
	<atom:link href="http://physxinfo.com/news/tag/poll/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://physxinfo.com/news</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 11:42:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>GPU Technology Poll: CUDA, PhysX, DX11, Eyefinity</title>
		<link>http://physxinfo.com/news/1178/gpu-technology-poll-cuda-physx-dx11-eyefinity/</link>
		<comments>http://physxinfo.com/news/1178/gpu-technology-poll-cuda-physx-dx11-eyefinity/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2009 14:03:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Zogrim</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles, Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CUDA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DX11]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PhysX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Poll]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://physxinfo.com/news/?p=1178</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<style type="text/css">
#leftcontainerBox {
float:left;
position: fixed;
top: 60%;
left: 70px;
}

#leftcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
clear:both;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;

padding-bottom:2px;
}


#bottomcontainerBox {
height: 30px;
width:50%;
padding-top:1px;
}

#bottomcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
height: 30px;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;
}

</style>
Hardware website PCPOP.COM has published an overview article about various GPU technologies and features, like 3D Vision, Stream, Eyefinity, OpenCL, etc. Article itself isn&#8217;t valuable much unless you know Chinese, but it has interesting poll included, with question &#8220;In addition to gaming performance,  which technologies are you interested in ?&#8221; and decent number of votes [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<style type="text/css">
#leftcontainerBox {
float:left;
position: fixed;
top: 60%;
left: 70px;
}

#leftcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
clear:both;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;

padding-bottom:2px;
}


#bottomcontainerBox {
height: 30px;
width:50%;
padding-top:1px;
}

#bottomcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
height: 30px;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;
}

</style>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Hardware website PCPOP.COM has published an <a href="http://www.pcpop.com/doc/0/476/476723.shtml" target="_blank">overview article</a> about various GPU technologies and features, like 3D Vision, Stream, Eyefinity, OpenCL, etc. Article itself isn&#8217;t valuable much unless you know Chinese, but it has interesting poll included, with question &#8220;<strong>In addition to gaming performance,  which technologies are you interested in ?</strong>&#8221; and decent number of votes already.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-1179" title="poll" src="http://physxinfo.com/news/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/poll.jpg" alt="" width="465" height="229" /></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Users put features like low noise and power consumption  (功耗、发热、噪音、节能) in the first place, DX11 support goes second, hardware accelerated PhysX on third place, Anti-aliasing (抗锯齿技术) comes fourth.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://physxinfo.com/news/1178/gpu-technology-poll-cuda-physx-dx11-eyefinity/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Which Physics Acceleration Technology looks more promising ?</title>
		<link>http://physxinfo.com/news/538/which-physics-acceleration-technology-looks-more-promising/</link>
		<comments>http://physxinfo.com/news/538/which-physics-acceleration-technology-looks-more-promising/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 17:01:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Zogrim</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Other]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bullet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Havok]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PhysX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Poll]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://physxinfo.com/news/?p=538</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<style type="text/css">
#leftcontainerBox {
float:left;
position: fixed;
top: 60%;
left: 70px;
}

#leftcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
clear:both;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;

padding-bottom:2px;
}


#bottomcontainerBox {
height: 30px;
width:50%;
padding-top:1px;
}

#bottomcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
height: 30px;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;
}

</style>
Expreview asked its readers recently, about which physics acceleration technology looks more promising to them.
Now, after 5 days and 281 votes, Nvidia PhysX is leading, Bullet is going second (probably, thanks to AMD users and all recent hype, as Bullet was listed as &#8220;AMD Bullet&#8221;, while being independent development),  Intel Havok comes third.

Polling is not [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<style type="text/css">
#leftcontainerBox {
float:left;
position: fixed;
top: 60%;
left: 70px;
}

#leftcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
clear:both;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;

padding-bottom:2px;
}


#bottomcontainerBox {
height: 30px;
width:50%;
padding-top:1px;
}

#bottomcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
height: 30px;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;
}

</style>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><em>Expreview</em> <a href="http://en.expreview.com/2009/10/14/poll-which-physics-acceleration-technology-is-most-promising.html" target="_blank">asked its readers</a> recently, about which physics acceleration technology looks more promising to them.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Now, after 5 days and 281 votes, <strong>Nvidia PhysX</strong> is leading, <strong>Bullet</strong> is going second (probably, thanks to AMD users and all recent hype, as Bullet was listed as &#8220;AMD Bullet&#8221;, while being independent development),  <strong>Intel Havok</strong> comes third.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><img class="nob" title="phys_pol" src="http://physxinfo.com/news/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/phys_pol.jpg" alt="phys_pol" width="604" height="178" /></p>
<p style="text-align: left;">Polling is not over, so you still can lend your vote.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://physxinfo.com/news/538/which-physics-acceleration-technology-looks-more-promising/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

