<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>PhysXInfo.com - PhysX News &#187; PCI-E</title>
	<atom:link href="http://physxinfo.com/news/tag/pci-e/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://physxinfo.com/news</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 15:52:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Dedicated PhysX GPU performance dependence on PCI-E bandwidth</title>
		<link>http://physxinfo.com/news/880/dedicated-physx-gpu-perfomance-dependence-on-pci-e-bandwidth/</link>
		<comments>http://physxinfo.com/news/880/dedicated-physx-gpu-perfomance-dependence-on-pci-e-bandwidth/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 06:31:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Zogrim</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles, Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Benchmark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PCI-E]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://physxinfo.com/news/?p=880</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<style type="text/css">
#leftcontainerBox {
float:left;
position: fixed;
top: 60%;
left: 70px;
}

#leftcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
clear:both;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;

padding-bottom:2px;
}


#bottomcontainerBox {
height: 30px;
width:50%;
padding-top:1px;
}

#bottomcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
height: 30px;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;
}

</style>
Using a mid- or low-end GPU as dedicated PhysX card is quite popular idea today (even among ATI owners), while PCI-E bandwidth requirements for dedicated PhysX GPU are not absolutely clear. Everyone knows, that x8 and even x4 would be enough, but what about PCI-E x1 ?
PCPOP.com has published article today, that investigates PhysX performance [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<style type="text/css">
#leftcontainerBox {
float:left;
position: fixed;
top: 60%;
left: 70px;
}

#leftcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
clear:both;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;

padding-bottom:2px;
}


#bottomcontainerBox {
height: 30px;
width:50%;
padding-top:1px;
}

#bottomcontainerBox .buttons {
float:left;
height: 30px;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;
}

</style>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Using a mid- or low-end GPU as dedicated PhysX card is <strong>quite popular idea</strong> today (even among ATI owners), while PCI-E bandwidth requirements for dedicated PhysX GPU are not absolutely clear. Everyone knows, that x8 and even x4 would be enough, but what about PCI-E x1 ?</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><em>PCPOP.com</em> has published article today, that investigates PhysX performance of GTX295 + 9800GT setup, with <strong>9800GT used in PCI-E x1/x4/x8 </strong>cases (unnecessary pins were taped).</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-885" title="pci-e_adj" src="http://physxinfo.com/news/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/pci-e_adj.png" alt="pci-e_adj" width="380" height="273" /></p>
<p>And, surprisingly, even <strong>PCI-E x1 usage isn&#8217;t affecting performance</strong> as much as it should at a glimpse.</p>
<p><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-881" title="batman-physx-pci-e" src="http://physxinfo.com/news/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/batman-physx-pci-e.jpg" alt="batman-physx-pci-e" width="500" height="400" /><br />
You can read rest of the article <a href="http://www.pcpop.com/doc/0/466/466548.shtml" target="_blank">here</a></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">BTW, users with old mobos (or lack of free full scale PCI-E slots) are asking sometimes &#8211; &#8220;<em>What if I just put my old 9600GT in PCI-E x1 slot ? Would that be enough for PhysX ?</em>&#8220;. Now they have some clarity. Of course, mechanical &#8220;adjustment&#8221; will be needed to make it fit, that can result in GPU/mobo malfunction, so we don&#8217;t recommend even to think about it until you are clearly sure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://physxinfo.com/news/880/dedicated-physx-gpu-perfomance-dependence-on-pci-e-bandwidth/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

