<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Dedicated PhysX GPU performance dependence on PCI-E bandwidth</title>
	<atom:link href="http://physxinfo.com/news/880/dedicated-physx-gpu-perfomance-dependence-on-pci-e-bandwidth/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://physxinfo.com/news/880/dedicated-physx-gpu-perfomance-dependence-on-pci-e-bandwidth/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 10:23:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: ping2low</title>
		<link>http://physxinfo.com/news/880/dedicated-physx-gpu-perfomance-dependence-on-pci-e-bandwidth/#comment-1322</link>
		<dc:creator>ping2low</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Oct 2010 17:16:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://physxinfo.com/news/?p=880#comment-1322</guid>
		<description>Luckily, Asus P5W64 has 4 full size PCIe slots with various lanes depending on config!!

Nice find!!!  =)   (i&#039;m sold!)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Luckily, Asus P5W64 has 4 full size PCIe slots with various lanes depending on config!!</p>
<p>Nice find!!!  =)   (i&#8217;m sold!)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: [nv40]</title>
		<link>http://physxinfo.com/news/880/dedicated-physx-gpu-perfomance-dependence-on-pci-e-bandwidth/#comment-1176</link>
		<dc:creator>[nv40]</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Sep 2010 09:23:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://physxinfo.com/news/?p=880#comment-1176</guid>
		<description>nobody knows? :*</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>nobody knows? :*</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zogrim</title>
		<link>http://physxinfo.com/news/880/dedicated-physx-gpu-perfomance-dependence-on-pci-e-bandwidth/#comment-1169</link>
		<dc:creator>Zogrim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 21:46:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://physxinfo.com/news/?p=880#comment-1169</guid>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;jose&lt;/b&gt;
&lt;i&gt;Am I susposed to read chinese now??&lt;/i&gt;
You don&#039;t need to read - graphs are sayng more than enough</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>jose</b><br />
<i>Am I susposed to read chinese now??</i><br />
You don&#8217;t need to read &#8211; graphs are sayng more than enough</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jose</title>
		<link>http://physxinfo.com/news/880/dedicated-physx-gpu-perfomance-dependence-on-pci-e-bandwidth/#comment-1167</link>
		<dc:creator>jose</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 15:50:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://physxinfo.com/news/?p=880#comment-1167</guid>
		<description>Am I susposed to read chinese now??

that link goes to a chinese language website.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Am I susposed to read chinese now??</p>
<p>that link goes to a chinese language website.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: [nv40]</title>
		<link>http://physxinfo.com/news/880/dedicated-physx-gpu-perfomance-dependence-on-pci-e-bandwidth/#comment-935</link>
		<dc:creator>[nv40]</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Aug 2010 21:36:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://physxinfo.com/news/?p=880#comment-935</guid>
		<description>hi, 
did all tests they performed on v1 pci-e or v2, cause in article x58 chipset have both standards from different x58 and ich10 hubs? i guess it was v2 but either assume it could be v1 from south bridge too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hi,<br />
did all tests they performed on v1 pci-e or v2, cause in article x58 chipset have both standards from different x58 and ich10 hubs? i guess it was v2 but either assume it could be v1 from south bridge too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ron</title>
		<link>http://physxinfo.com/news/880/dedicated-physx-gpu-perfomance-dependence-on-pci-e-bandwidth/#comment-577</link>
		<dc:creator>Ron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Apr 2010 08:22:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://physxinfo.com/news/?p=880#comment-577</guid>
		<description>I tried a similar test using a  asus p5n 570i (pci-e v1 switchable x1 or x8) and msi 750i (pci-e v2 x8) with an e5200, ATI 4830 and NV 8800gs. 

Generally speaking, my experience mirrors the article. However, the v1x1 did have noticeable, but tolerable, bandwidth issues. Both x8 slots were essentially equal however v2x8 was more fluid, I believe this is due to the halved latency of v2 and not the doubled bandwidth. Increasing the pci-e v1 bus to 111MHz reduced the lag on the v1x8 and noticeably boosted the v1x1 slot performance. 

My guestimation is that a v2x1 or better would fully satisfy any physx needs. Unfortunately, Intel chip sets typically have pci-e v1 x1 slots and even worse, they are on the south ICH bridge which introduces even more latency compared to most NV and AMD chips.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I tried a similar test using a  asus p5n 570i (pci-e v1 switchable x1 or x8) and msi 750i (pci-e v2 x8) with an e5200, ATI 4830 and NV 8800gs. </p>
<p>Generally speaking, my experience mirrors the article. However, the v1&#215;1 did have noticeable, but tolerable, bandwidth issues. Both x8 slots were essentially equal however v2&#215;8 was more fluid, I believe this is due to the halved latency of v2 and not the doubled bandwidth. Increasing the pci-e v1 bus to 111MHz reduced the lag on the v1&#215;8 and noticeably boosted the v1&#215;1 slot performance. </p>
<p>My guestimation is that a v2&#215;1 or better would fully satisfy any physx needs. Unfortunately, Intel chip sets typically have pci-e v1 x1 slots and even worse, they are on the south ICH bridge which introduces even more latency compared to most NV and AMD chips.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard</title>
		<link>http://physxinfo.com/news/880/dedicated-physx-gpu-perfomance-dependence-on-pci-e-bandwidth/#comment-358</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 05:52:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://physxinfo.com/news/?p=880#comment-358</guid>
		<description>I just bought a PCI Geforce 8400GS 512MB how bad of a performance hit would I have if I use a PCI card rather than PCI-E. My machine is an HTPC so the x1 PCI-e is being used by a TV Tuner. Any help would be appreciated.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just bought a PCI Geforce 8400GS 512MB how bad of a performance hit would I have if I use a PCI card rather than PCI-E. My machine is an HTPC so the x1 PCI-e is being used by a TV Tuner. Any help would be appreciated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amyn</title>
		<link>http://physxinfo.com/news/880/dedicated-physx-gpu-perfomance-dependence-on-pci-e-bandwidth/#comment-263</link>
		<dc:creator>Amyn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 06:45:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://physxinfo.com/news/?p=880#comment-263</guid>
		<description>Thanks this helped answer my question:

I have a Gigabyte extreme x58
Two 16x pcie
one 8x pcie
In order to give my 285gtx breathing room, I have my 8800gt in the bottom 8x slot.
How much of a performance hit does 8x physx have over 16x physx?

So, again thanks for the answer.
I kept it in 8x the heat generated by the two gfx cards in such close proximity isn&#039;t worth it, especially cause I can just oc the 285 with the lower temps.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks this helped answer my question:</p>
<p>I have a Gigabyte extreme x58<br />
Two 16x pcie<br />
one 8x pcie<br />
In order to give my 285gtx breathing room, I have my 8800gt in the bottom 8x slot.<br />
How much of a performance hit does 8x physx have over 16x physx?</p>
<p>So, again thanks for the answer.<br />
I kept it in 8x the heat generated by the two gfx cards in such close proximity isn&#8217;t worth it, especially cause I can just oc the 285 with the lower temps.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

