Comments on: ATI HD 5870 + NV GT 220 PhysX Benchmarks

By: rUmX

rUmX — Fri, 17 Sep 2010 00:54:15 +0000

FPS for 5870 are low because they’re run at 12×10 meaning the 5870 GPU isn’t even getting a work out at all. They run at this low resolution because the GT220 is a very low end GPU and so it cannot handle anything higher. None of the framerates it has produced are even playable.

By: Zogrim

Zogrim — Sun, 21 Feb 2010 11:05:27 +0000

jasonl Here are benchmarks with 5870 + GT220/9600GT 9600 is slight faster.

By: jasonl

jasonl — Sun, 21 Feb 2010 07:33:16 +0000

i was just wondering does a 5870 + 9600 gt or 9800 gt(for physx) have a bigger improvement than a 5870 + 220 gt?

I am debating should i buy a 9600 gt or 220 gt for physx

thanks

By: Pakin

Pakin — Mon, 08 Feb 2010 08:02:04 +0000

Basically because when the CPU is doing the Phyxs processing is acting like a bottle neck for the ATI GPU.

By: Justine

Justine — Fri, 22 Jan 2010 10:58:25 +0000

What? why the hell the gt 220 beats the hd 5870?? even if the test are physx only..

By: Paul

Paul — Tue, 05 Jan 2010 21:44:56 +0000

The performance drawback from Pci-e 16x to 1x is only 4%, it’s ridiculous.

By: Zogrim

Zogrim — Thu, 03 Dec 2009 06:09:24 +0000

Reboot Certain tests indicates it won't affects performance much

By: Reboot

Reboot — Wed, 02 Dec 2009 23:54:00 +0000

Since not everyone has a two slotted PCI-e 16x, what about dremeling the GT220 to fit it in a PCI-e 1x slot?
How would that affect the results?