<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: John Carmack speaking about hardware PhysX at QuakeCon 2009</title>
	<atom:link href="http://physxinfo.com/news/24/john-carmack-speaking-about-hardware-physx-at-quakecon-2009/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://physxinfo.com/news/24/john-carmack-speaking-about-hardware-physx-at-quakecon-2009/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 05:35:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: AquaGeneeral</title>
		<link>http://physxinfo.com/news/24/john-carmack-speaking-about-hardware-physx-at-quakecon-2009/#comment-848</link>
		<dc:creator>AquaGeneeral</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jul 2010 09:20:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://physxinfo.com/news/?p=24#comment-848</guid>
		<description>I can&#039;t believe I never thought of looking back on the older articles. 

When I watched the conference I was very surprised that someone actually asked about what he had to say about PhysX, though it&#039;s sad he didn&#039;t say anything positive. While that isn&#039;t surprising as it seems as id Tech 5 uses are proprietary physics engine, plus they plan on open-sourcing the engine in the future.

That&#039;s really unfortunate that the author of that video decided to purposely misguide everyone. It seems to be quite a trend around YouTube.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t believe I never thought of looking back on the older articles. </p>
<p>When I watched the conference I was very surprised that someone actually asked about what he had to say about PhysX, though it&#8217;s sad he didn&#8217;t say anything positive. While that isn&#8217;t surprising as it seems as id Tech 5 uses are proprietary physics engine, plus they plan on open-sourcing the engine in the future.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s really unfortunate that the author of that video decided to purposely misguide everyone. It seems to be quite a trend around YouTube.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

