<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: GPU PhysX in Dark Void: comparison video</title>
	<atom:link href="http://physxinfo.com/news/1689/gpu-physx-in-dark-void-comparison-video/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://physxinfo.com/news/1689/gpu-physx-in-dark-void-comparison-video/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 10:23:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: chris</title>
		<link>http://physxinfo.com/news/1689/gpu-physx-in-dark-void-comparison-video/#comment-228</link>
		<dc:creator>chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 07:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://physxinfo.com/news/?p=1689#comment-228</guid>
		<description>one side of the screen looks like a bad game.  the other side looks like a bad game with smoke, and better sparklies.  

has nvidia gone back to allowing those with ATI cards to run PhysX on their second card (likely their old Nvidia)?  until they do, and possibly not even then, the A+ titles aren&#039;t going to waste time doing extra coding for 30-70% of the market depending on which company has the best card at the moment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>one side of the screen looks like a bad game.  the other side looks like a bad game with smoke, and better sparklies.  </p>
<p>has nvidia gone back to allowing those with ATI cards to run PhysX on their second card (likely their old Nvidia)?  until they do, and possibly not even then, the A+ titles aren&#8217;t going to waste time doing extra coding for 30-70% of the market depending on which company has the best card at the moment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zogrim</title>
		<link>http://physxinfo.com/news/1689/gpu-physx-in-dark-void-comparison-video/#comment-226</link>
		<dc:creator>Zogrim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 04:32:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://physxinfo.com/news/?p=1689#comment-226</guid>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;GenL&lt;/b&gt;
I have only two GPUs, so I won&#039;t do any benchmarking soon, but I&#039;ll try to gather &lt;a href=&quot;http://physxinfo.com/news/1657/dark-void-physx-benchmarks-round-up/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;other articles&lt;/a&gt;, same as I did &lt;a href=&quot;http://physxinfo.com/news/244/batman-arkham-asylum-physx-benchmarks-roundup/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;with Batman&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>GenL</b><br />
I have only two GPUs, so I won&#8217;t do any benchmarking soon, but I&#8217;ll try to gather <a href="http://physxinfo.com/news/1657/dark-void-physx-benchmarks-round-up/" rel="nofollow">other articles</a>, same as I did <a href="http://physxinfo.com/news/244/batman-arkham-asylum-physx-benchmarks-roundup/" rel="nofollow">with Batman</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GenL</title>
		<link>http://physxinfo.com/news/1689/gpu-physx-in-dark-void-comparison-video/#comment-225</link>
		<dc:creator>GenL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 02:25:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://physxinfo.com/news/?p=1689#comment-225</guid>
		<description>How about a performance comparison with different dedicated GPUs? I really hope to see such article soon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How about a performance comparison with different dedicated GPUs? I really hope to see such article soon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: michel</title>
		<link>http://physxinfo.com/news/1689/gpu-physx-in-dark-void-comparison-video/#comment-222</link>
		<dc:creator>michel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 12:42:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://physxinfo.com/news/?p=1689#comment-222</guid>
		<description>An additional GTX260 (or higher) für this gimmick?

&quot;are those effects worth hardware&quot;
For these some games out there? Definitely no!
Only for those wo also buy SLi Configs for many many bucks more to have more AA/AF and Details than a Single Card can handle. And i think most of those don&#039;t, too. For these few games?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An additional GTX260 (or higher) für this gimmick?</p>
<p>&#8220;are those effects worth hardware&#8221;<br />
For these some games out there? Definitely no!<br />
Only for those wo also buy SLi Configs for many many bucks more to have more AA/AF and Details than a Single Card can handle. And i think most of those don&#8217;t, too. For these few games?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

